Merged
Conversation
lhoestq
reviewed
Oct 8, 2021
Member
lhoestq
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks ! This is going in the right direction :)
I think it's better if we stick with the pandas CSV writer rather than Arrow's, for consistency with JSON but also because the pandas one may be more mature
Member
|
I think you can just add a test |
Contributor
Author
|
Hi @lhoestq, |
bhavitvyamalik
commented
Oct 15, 2021
lhoestq
approved these changes
Oct 26, 2021
Member
lhoestq
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks all good now, thanks @bhavitvyamalik @mariosasko :)
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR extends the multi-proc method used in #2747 for
to_jsontoto_csvas well.Results on my machine post benchmarking on
ascent_kbdataset (giving ~45% improvement when compared to num_proc = 1):This is a WIP as writing tests is pending for this PR.
I'm also exploring this approach for which I'm using
pyarrow-5.0.0.